Cost of hospital admission for antiarrhythmic drug initiation in atrial fibrillation

26Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Initiation of some rhythm-control therapies for atrial fibrillation (AF) requires an inpatient hospital stay and telemetry monitoring, adding to the cost burden of AF. However, specific cost data for inpatient initiation of AF therapies are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To examine costs associated with initiating sotalol or dofetilide in the inpatient setting in the US. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used data from billing/discharge records in the Premier Perspective Database for adults with a primary diagnosis of AF, hospitalized between January 2002 and September 2007. Patients had to have received 4 or more sotalol doses or 5 or more dofetilide doses starting within 2 days of admission (with ≥1 dose within 3 days of discharge). Patients admitted solely for AF drug initiation were identified by excluding patients who were admitted on an emergency basis, received care in the emergency department, or underwent major surgical procedures. The primary outcome was direct medical costs for in-hospital services during the stay. RESULTS: Among 7290 patients included in the analysis (4847 sotalol, 2443 dofetilide), mean total inpatient costs per patient were $3278 in the sotalol group and $3610 in the dofetilide group. The greatest costs were for room/board ($1874 sotalol, $1985 dofetilide) and cardiology/ electrocardiograms ($394 sotalol, $443 dofetilide). Pharmacy costs were $230 and $201 per patient in the sotalol and dofetilide groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The admission of patients for in-hospital initiation of AF rhythm-control therapy represents a high cost burden in the US.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, M. H., Klingman, D., Lin, J., Pathak, P., & Battleman, D. (2009). Cost of hospital admission for antiarrhythmic drug initiation in atrial fibrillation. Annals of Pharmacotherapy, 43(5), 840–848. https://doi.org/10.1345/aph.1L698

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free