Declines in lower extremity amputation in the US medicare population, 2000-2010

37Citations
Citations of this article
54Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: Despite evidence that improved outcomes are associated with more distal lower extremity amputations (LEA), the impact of recent advances in the orthopedic approach to diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) on the use and anatomic level of LEAs is unknown. Methods: We queried the complete Medicare Part B claims database (2000-2010) for volume and reimbursement of all codes designating LEAs (hip and below) as well as a selection representing orthopedic treatments for DFU. Procedures were grouped for analysis; utilization rates per 100,000 Medicare enrollees and compound annual growth rates (CAGRs) of payments were calculated. Data are presented in the context of national health care spending trends. Results: LEA utilization rates declined from 282.5 to 201.0 per 105 enrollees (-28.8%) over the decade. In general, declines were greatest for the most proximal levels and smallest for the most distal sites. Use of orthopedic treatments for DFUs, including Achilles tendon release and total contact casting, rose from 26.0 to 63.3 per 105 enrollees (+143.3%). Payment trends mirrored utilization data. During this period, total health care spending in the United States increased at a CAGR of 6.5%, whereas total Medicare payments rose at a CAGR of 8.9%. Conclusion: The last decade saw a marked decline in the use of LEA in the Medicare population, despite unfavorable demographic changes. Furthermore, it became more likely for LEAs to occur at distal, limb-conserving locations. Over the same period, use of orthopedic treatments for DFU increased sharply. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective comparative database analysis. © The Author(s) 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Belatti, D. A., & Phisitkul, P. (2013). Declines in lower extremity amputation in the US medicare population, 2000-2010. Foot and Ankle International, 34(7), 923–931. https://doi.org/10.1177/1071100713475357

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free