Democratic consequences of hostile media perceptions - The case of Gaza settlers

102Citations
Citations of this article
86Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this article, the authors examine the consequences of the hostile-media phenomenon and advance the argument that people's perceptions of hostile coverage shape their trust in mainstream media institutions. Media trust in turn affects trust in democracy and willingness to accept democratic decisions. These ideas are tested on a sample of Jewish Settlers in the Gaza Strip, in the weeks before a Likud Party vote on Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's plan to pull out of the Gaza Strip and evacuate settlers from their homes. Findings show that hostile media perceptions were negatively related to settlers' trust in media and that trust in media was positively related to trust in democracy, which, in turn, affected settlers' intentions to forcefully resist Sharon's evacuation plan. No direct association was found between hostile media perceptions and intentions to forcefully resist evacuation. © 2005 by the President and the Fellows of Harvard College.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tsfati, Y., & Cohen, J. (2005). Democratic consequences of hostile media perceptions - The case of Gaza settlers. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 10(4), 28–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1081180X05280776

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free