Developments, South African Constitutional Law

  • Pillay A
ISSN: 02729490
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Freedom of Religion-Religiously Motivated Use of Cannabis-South African Constitutional Court holds that laws that ban the use of cannabis without an exemption for religious use violate freedom of religion of Rastafari, but these violations are justifiable under the general Constitutional Limitation Clause.-Prince v. President of the Law Society of the Cape of Good Hope.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pillay, A. (2003). Developments, South African Constitutional Law. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 1(1), 152–158. Retrieved from http://heinonline.org.ez.sun.ac.za/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/injcl1&div=15&start_page=152&collection=journals&set_as_cursor=2&men_tab=srchresults

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free