Effects of biofeedback in phonatory disorders and phonatory performance: A systematic literature review

25Citations
Citations of this article
119Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The purpose of this article was to systematically review the literature on the effects of biofeedback therapy in the domain of phonatory disorders and phonatory performance, using studies in peer-reviewed journals. An extensive definition of biofeedback is given and its place in voice treatment is defined. Eighteen group or case studies or reports considering the effects of electromyographic, laryngoscopic and acoustic biofeedback in dysphonic patients (hyperfunctional voice disorders, hypofunctional voice disorders, psychogenic voice disorder, laryngeal trauma, total laryngectomy, vocal cord dysfunction) and participants with normal voices are included and an analysis of procedure as well as research design and results is presented. The usefulness of biofeedback in phonatory disorders and performance was to be interpreted based on tendencies, since there is a lack of randomized controlled efficacy studies. In only 3 of 18 studies (16.7%) did biofeedback therapy fail to improve voice quality or not result in better results than other forms of therapy. Recommendations for improved methodologies are made, which include the use of acoustic voice quality parameters. © 2006 Springer Science+Business Media, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Maryn, Y., De Bodt, M., & Van Cauwenberge, P. (2006, March). Effects of biofeedback in phonatory disorders and phonatory performance: A systematic literature review. Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-006-9005-7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free