Efficacy, safety, predictability, contrast sensitivity, and aberrations after femtosecond laser lenticule extraction

  • Vestergaard A
  • Grauslund J
  • Ivarsen A
 et al. 
  • 41

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 51

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Purpose To compare femtosecond lenticule extraction and small-incision lenticule extraction to treat moderate to high myopia. Setting Department of Ophthalmology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark. Design Prospective clinical single-masked paired-eye study. Methods An intrastromal lenticule was cut by a femtosecond laser and manually extracted. In femtosecond lenticule extraction, a laser in situ keratomileusis-like flap allowed removal of the lenticule, whereas in small-incision lenticule extraction, it was removed through a small incision. Follow-up was 6 months. Results Thirty-five patients were treated with femtosecond lenticule extraction in 1 eye and small-incision lenticule extraction in the other. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -7.6 diopters (D) ± 1.0 (SD) (range -6.0 to -9.9 D). After both procedures, 90% of eyes had an uncorrected distance visual acuity of 20/40 or better 1 day postoperatively, increasing to 100% after 6 months. At 6 months, the mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) improved significantly by approximately 1.5 letters on the logMAR chart. No eyes lost or gained 2 lines or more of CDVA after either procedure. The achieved refraction was a mean of -0.04 ± 0.38 D from the attempted refraction after femtosecond lenticule extraction and -0.09 ± 0.39 D after small-incision lenticule extraction. After both procedures, 88% of eyes were within ±0.50 D. Contrast sensitivity was unchanged. The changes in higher-order aberrations were similar. Conclusion The all-femtosecond laser flap-based and cap-based techniques produced almost identical results up to 6 months postoperatively in eyes with moderate to high myopia. Financial Disclosure Dr. Hjortdal received travel reimbursement from Carl Zeiss Meditec AG. No other author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Anders H. Vestergaard

  • Jakob Grauslund

  • Anders R. Ivarsen

  • Jesper O. Hjortdal

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free