An empirical evaluation of cusum control charts for use in robust quality control of surgical and binary outcomes

1Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

It is well-known that standard statistical process control tools (eg, Shewhart charts) are not robust to certain features of human-generated data typically seen in health care management. For example, the presence of positive serial correlation (the tendency for successive outcomes to cluster as opposed to being truly random) leads to increased "false alarms." Previous work has introduced potential work-arounds in the case of continuous data (eg, data that can take on many values). In this article we describe a different but related problem in the case of binary data (eg, "survived" vs "deceased"). We demonstrate the value of using the Cumulative Sum chart, which is shown to be relatively robust to serial correlation, and much more efficient and effective than existing control charts. © 2008 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Huesch, M. D., Madan, A., & Borckardt, J. J. (2008). An empirical evaluation of cusum control charts for use in robust quality control of surgical and binary outcomes. Quality Management in Health Care, 17(3), 218–226. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.QMH.0000326726.93578.a1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free