Endoscopic management of failed colonoscopy in clinical practice: To change endoscopist, instrument, or both?

20Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background and aims: Caecal intubation fails up to 20% of colonoscopy in clinical practice. We aimed to assess whether (1) in patients with a prior incomplete colonoscopy with a standard adult colonoscope, a subsequent caecal intubation may be achieved with the same instrument; (2) there are factors predicting a repeated unsuccessful colonoscopy; and (3) how frequently completion can be further achieved by shifting to a standard gastroscope. Materials and methods: Data of patients with a previously failed bowel examination referred to our community hospital for a further colonoscopy were reviewed. When caecal intubation still failed with standard colonoscope, complete colonoscopy was usually attempted by shifting to a gastroscope. Results: Overall, 451 patients with a prior colonoscopy were considered. By using a standard colonoscope, caecal intubation rate was achieved in 285 out of 296 patients with prior complete examination and in 121 out of 155 patients with a prior failed colonoscopy (96.3% vs. 78.1%, p∈

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Morini, S., Zullo, A., Hassan, C., Lorenzetti, R., & Campo, S. M. A. (2011). Endoscopic management of failed colonoscopy in clinical practice: To change endoscopist, instrument, or both? International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 26(1), 103–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-1016-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free