Does the estimation of light attenuation in tissue increase the accuracy of reflectance pulse oximetry at low oxygen saturations in vivo?

3Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

A new technique was validated in vivo in reflectance pulse oximetry for measuring low oxygen saturations. Two pairs of light emitter/detector diodes allow for estimation of light attenuation (LA) in tissue, which is assumed to be responsible for the inaccuracy of pulse oximetry at less than 70% arterial oxygen saturation. For validation, 17 newborn piglets were desaturated stepwise from 21% to 1.25% inspiratory oxygen concentration during general anesthesia, and arterial oxygen saturation was measured with the reflectance pulse oximeter adjusted for LA in tissue, with a standard transmission pulse oximeter and a hemoximeter. LA in tissue could be quantified and was different between snout and foreleg (probability level (p) < 0.05). At arterial oxygen saturations above 70%, the bias between the methods was at 0%-1% and the variability 4%-5%. From 2% to 100% arterial oxygen saturation, the reflectance pulse oximeter estimated oxyhemoglobin saturation more accurately than a conventional transmission pulse oximeter (p < 0.05). At low oxygen saturations below 70%, the bias and variability of the reflectance pulse oximeter calibration were closer to the hemoximeter measurements than the transmission pulse oximeter (p < 0.05). The variability of the reflectance pulse oximeter was slightly lower than the traditional oximeter by taking into account the LA in tissue (9% versus 11% -15%, ns), and thus, the quality of the individual calibration lines improved (correlation coefficient, p < 0.05). © 2006 IEEE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kisch-Wedel, H., Bernreuter, P., Kemming, G., Albert, M., & Zwissler, B. (2009). Does the estimation of light attenuation in tissue increase the accuracy of reflectance pulse oximetry at low oxygen saturations in vivo? IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 56(9), 2271–2279. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBME.2009.2019629

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free