Generic

Evaluating research: From informed peer review to bibliometrics

Abramo G, D'Angelo C ...see all

Scientometrics, vol. 87, issue 3 (2011) pp. 499-514 Published by Kluwer Academic Publishers

  • 116

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 61

    Citations

    Citations of this article.
  • N/A

    Views

    ScienceDirect users who have downloaded this article.
Sign in to save reference

Abstract

National research assessment exercises are becoming regular events in ever more countries. The present work contrasts the peer-review and bibliometrics approaches in the conduct of these exercises. The comparison is conducted in terms of the essential parameters of any measurement system: accuracy, robustness, validity, functionality, time and costs. Empirical evidence shows that for the natural and formal sciences, the biblio- metric methodology is by far preferable to peer-review. Setting up national databases of publications by individual authors, derived from Web of Science or Scopus databases, would allow much better, cheaper and more frequent national research assessments.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Bibliometrics
  • Decision support systems
  • Peer review
  • Research assessment
  • Research productivity

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free