Evaluating research: From informed peer review to bibliometrics

  • Abramo G
  • D'Angelo C
  • 128


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 64


    Citations of this article.


National research assessment exercises are becoming regular events in ever more countries. The present work contrasts the peer-review and bibliometrics approaches in the conduct of these exercises. The comparison is conducted in terms of the essential parameters of any measurement system: accuracy, robustness, validity, functionality, time and costs. Empirical evidence shows that for the natural and formal sciences, the biblio- metric methodology is by far preferable to peer-review. Setting up national databases of publications by individual authors, derived from Web of Science or Scopus databases, would allow much better, cheaper and more frequent national research assessments.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Bibliometrics
  • Decision support systems
  • Peer review
  • Research assessment
  • Research productivity

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text


  • Giovanni Abramo

  • Ciriaco Andrea D'Angelo

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free