Journal article

An evaluation of the reliability of time sampling versus continuous observation data collection

Klesges R, Woolfrey J, Vollmer J ...see all

Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, vol. 16, issue 4 (1985) pp. 303-307

  • 7

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 9

    Citations

    Citations of this article.
  • 208

    Views

    ScienceDirect users who have downloaded this article.
Sign in to save reference

Abstract

Thirty (10 male, 20 female) children, ages 41 to 71 months, were observed simultaneously in a freeplay setting by two observers using a validated assessment of physical activity in children (i.e. the FATS). One observer utilized a whole interval time sampling method of data recording and the second observer used a hand-held computer and continuously entered observations whenever a child's activity level changed, while the computer simultaneously calculated elapsed time (in tenths of seconds) spent in each behavioral category. Overall activity scores generated by the two approaches correlated 0.90 although the time sampling method produced lower estimates of physical activity. It is concluded that whole interval time sampling is a reliable cost-effective method of assessing physical activity levels in children and may be preferable to the continuous computer-assisted approach that was utilized. ?? 1985.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

  • Robert C. Klesges

  • Joan Woolfrey

  • James Vollmer

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free