The experimetrics of public goods: Inferring motivations from contributions

50Citations
Citations of this article
74Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In public goods experiments, stochastic choice, censoring and motivational heterogeneity give scope for disagreement over the extent of unselfishness, and whether it is reciprocal or altruistic. We show that these problems can be addressed econometrically, by estimating a finite mixture model to isolate types, incorporating double censoring and a tremble term. Most subjects act selfishly, but a substantial proportion are reciprocal with altruism playing only a marginal role. Isolating reciprocators enables a test of Sugden's model of voluntary contributions. We estimate that reciprocators display a self-serving bias relative to the model. © Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bardsley, N., & Moffatt, P. G. (2007). The experimetrics of public goods: Inferring motivations from contributions. Theory and Decision, 62(2), 161–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-006-9013-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free