"Paradox" appears increasingly in organization studies, often to describe conflicting demands, opposing perspectives, or seemingly illogical findings. This article helps researchers move beyond labeling - to explore paradoxes and contribute insights more in tune with organizational complexity and ambiguity. I first develop a framework that clarifies the nature of paradoxical tensions, reinforcing cycles, and their management. Using this framework, I then review studies in which paradoxes spurred by change and plurality are investigated. I conclude by outlining strategies for identifying and representing paradox, addressing implications for research.
CITATION STYLE
Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review. Academy of Management. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2000.3707712
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.