Face-to-face and computer-mediated communication: What does theory tell us and what have we learned so far?

  • Rhoads M
  • 134

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 30

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Information and communication technologies (ICT) have not had the predicted effect of substantially altering work and work-based travel patterns. Some researchers argue that one of the reasons may be the inability of ICT to effectively replicate characteristics of face-to-face communication. To examine the differences between computer-mediated and face-to-face communication, this article explores theories of face-to-face communication and synthesizes lessons from studies of virtual and face-to-face teams and groups. Findings on the comparative production outcomes and performance of virtual versus face-to-face teams are mixed, suggesting that it is not clear whether face-to-face communication is necessarily superior to computer-mediated communication for many collaborative processes. Planning can gain from a better understanding of the advantages and limitations of computer-mediated communication so that it may more effectively implement virtual strategies.

Author-supplied keywords

  • communication in planning
  • telecommuting
  • teleconferencing
  • telework
  • virtual planning
  • virtual teams

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Mohja Rhoads

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free