Factor structure and concurrent validity of the World Assumptions Scale

57Citations
Citations of this article
69Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The factor structure of the World Assumptions Scale (WAS) was assessed by means of confirmatory factor analysis. The sample was comprised of 1,710 participants who had been exposed to trauma that resulted in whiplash. Four alternative models were specified and estimated using LISREL 8.72. A correlated 8-factor solution was the best explanation of the sample data. The estimates of reliability of eight subscales of the WAS ranged from .48 to .82. Scores from five subscales correlated significantly with trauma severity as measured by the Harvard Trauma Questionnaire, although the magnitude of the correlations was low to modest, ranging from .08 to - .43. It is suggested that the WAS has adequate psychometric properties for use in both clinical and research settings. © 2007 International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Elklit, A., Shevlin, M., Solomon, Z., & Dekel, R. (2007). Factor structure and concurrent validity of the World Assumptions Scale. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 20(3), 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20203

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free