Five-year Results of a Randomized Trial with Open-label Extension of Triamcinolone Acetonide for Refractory Diabetic Macular Edema

  • Gillies M
  • Simpson J
  • Gaston C
 et al. 
  • 1


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • N/A


    Citations of this article.


Objective: To report 5-year outcomes from a clinical trial of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME) and impaired vision despite previous laser treatment. Design: Prospective, double-masked, randomized clinical trial. After completing the 2-year visit, all eyes, including those initially randomized to receive placebo, received IVTA according to prospectively defined guidelines. Participants and Controls: A total of 69 eyes (41 patients) were entered into the study, with 34 eyes initially receiving active treatment and 35 eyes receiving placebo. Five-year data were available for 44 of 67 eyes (66%). For the 23 eyes with missing 5-year data, of which 13 received placebo and 10 received IVTA, the last observation was carried forward. Intervention: Intravitreal injection of 0.1 ml of 40 mg/ml triamcinolone acetonide with adjunctive laser therapy where appropriate. Main Outcome Measures: Improvement of best-corrected logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution visual acuity by ≥5 letters after 5 years compared with baseline and 2 years, and incidence of adverse events. Secondary outcome was the change in central macular thickness. Results: Improvement of ≥5 letters after 5 years was found in 14 of 33 eyes (42%) initially treated with IVTA compared with 11 of 34 eyes (32%) initially treated with placebo (zGEE = 0.81, P = 0.4). Foveal thickness decreased by 30 μm (95% confidence interval, -47 to 107 μm) less in the initial-IVTA group than in the initial-placebo group at 5 years (zGEE = 0.76, P = 0.45); 5 of 11 eyes (45%) from the initial-IVTA group that were phakic at commencement of the third year required cataract surgery. A similar number of eyes from each group required ongoing treatment from the third year onward with both laser and IVTA, indicating that IVTA treatment for 2 years does not lead to reduction in the risk of recurrent edema. Conclusions: The majority of eyes that initially improved with IVTA maintained their gain after 5 years. No new safety concerns were identified. IVTA treatment may be considered in carefully selected cases of impaired vision caused by advanced DME that are unresponsive to other interventions. Financial Disclosure(s): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references. © 2009 American Academy of Ophthalmology.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in


  • M.C. Gillies

  • J.M. Simpson

  • C. Gaston

  • G. Hunt

  • H. Ali

  • M. Zhu

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free