Heterogeneity in molecular recognition by restriction endonucleases: Osmotic and hydrostatic pressure effects on bamHI, Pvu II, and EcoRV specificity

72Citations
Citations of this article
29Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The cleavage specificity of the Pvu II and BamHI restriction endonucleases is found to be dramatically reduced at elevated osmotic pressure. Relaxation in specificity of these otherwise highly accurate and specific enzymes, previously termed 'star activity,' is uniquely correlated with osmotic pressure between 0 and 100 atmospheres. No other colligative solvent property exhibits a uniform correlation with star activity for all of the compounds tested. Application of hydrostatic pressure counteracts the effects of osmotic pressure and restores the natural selectivity of the enzymes for their canonical recognition sequences. These results indicate that water solvation plays an important role in the site-specific recognition of DNA by many restriction enzymes. Osmotic pressure did not induce an analogous effect on the specificity of the EcoRV endonuclease, implying that selective hydration effects do not participate in DNA recognition in this system. Hydrostatic pressure was found to have little effect on the star activity induced by changes in ionic strength, pH, or divalent cation, suggesting that distinct mechanisms may exist for these observed alterations in specificity. Recent evidence has indicated that BamHI and EcoRI share similar structural motifs, while Pvu II and EcoRV belong to a different structural family. Evidently, the use of hydration water to assist in site-specific recognition is a motif neither limited to nor defined by structural families.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Robinson, C. R., & Sligar, S. G. (1995). Heterogeneity in molecular recognition by restriction endonucleases: Osmotic and hydrostatic pressure effects on bamHI, Pvu II, and EcoRV specificity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 92(8), 3444–3448. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.92.8.3444

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free