Hypermedia discourse: Contesting networks of ideas and arguments

9Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This invited contribution motivates the Hypermedia Discourse research programme, investigating the reading, writing and contesting of ideas as hypermedia networks grounded in discourse schemes. We are striving for cognitively and computationally tractable conceptual structures: fluid enough to serve as augmentations to group working memory, yet structured enough to support long term memory. I will describe how such networks can be (i) mapped by multiple analysts to visualize and interrogate the claims and arguments in a literature, and (ii) mapped in real time to manage a team's information sources, competing interpretations, arguments and decisions, particularly in time- pressured scenarios where harnessing collective intelligence is a priority. Given the current geo-political and environmental context, the growth in distributed teamwork, and the need for multidisciplinary approaches to wicked problems, there has never been a greater need for sensemaking tools to help diverse stakeholders build common ground. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2007.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shum, S. B. (2007). Hypermedia discourse: Contesting networks of ideas and arguments. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 4604 LNAI, pp. 29–44). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73681-3_3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free