The impact of neutrality, niche differentiation and species input on diversity and abundance distributions

89Citations
Citations of this article
134Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We present a spatially-explicit generalization of Hubbell's model of community dynamics in which the assumption of neutrality is relaxed by incorporating dispersal limitation and habitat preference. In simulations, diversity and species abundances were governed by the rate at which new species were introduced (usually called 'speciation') and nearly unaffected by dispersal limitation and habitat preference. Of course, in the absence of species input, diversity is maintained solely by niche differences. We conclude that the success of the neutral model in predicting the abundance distribution has nothing to do with neutrality, but rather with the species-introduction process: when new species enter a community regularly as singletons, the typical J-shaped abundance distribution, with a long tail of rare species, is always observed, whether species differ in habitat preferences or not. We suggest that many communities are indeed driven by the introduction process, accounting for high diversity and rarity, and that species differences may be largely irrelevant for either. © Oikos.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zillio, T., & Condit, R. (2007). The impact of neutrality, niche differentiation and species input on diversity and abundance distributions. Oikos, 116(6), 931–940. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0030-1299.2007.15662.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free