The impact of public guarantees on bank risk-taking: Evidence from a natural experiment

130Citations
Citations of this article
165Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In 2001, government guarantees for savings banks in Germany were removed following a lawsuit. We use this natural experiment to examine the effect of government guarantees on bank risk-taking. The results suggest that banks whose government guarantee was removed reduced credit risk by cutting off the riskiest borrowers from credit. Using a difference-in-differences approach we show that none of these effects are present in a control group of German banks to whom the guarantee was not applicable. Furthermore, savings banks adjusted their liabilities away from risk-sensitive debt instruments after the removal of the guarantee, while we do not observe this for the control group. We also document that yield spreads of savings banks' bonds increased significantly right after the announcement of the decision to remove guarantees, while the yield spread of a sample of bonds issued by the control group remained unchanged. The evidence implies that public guarantees may be associated with substantial moral hazard effects. © The Authors 2013.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gropp, R., Gruendl, C., & Guettler, A. (2014). The impact of public guarantees on bank risk-taking: Evidence from a natural experiment. Review of Finance, 18(2), 457–488. https://doi.org/10.1093/rof/rft014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free