Inhibiting responses when switching: Does it matter?

  • Verbruggen F
  • Liefooghe B
  • Szmalec A
 et al. 
  • 59


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 37


    Citations of this article.


In the present study, cued task-switching was combined with the stop-signal paradigm in order to investigate the interaction between response inhibition and task-switching. In line with earlier findings from Schuch and Koch (2003), the results show that switch and repetition trials following inhibited responses were processed equally fast. This confirms the hypothesis of Schuch and Koch (2003) that after signal-inhibit trials there is less interference, resulting in a disappearance of the switch cost. Furthermore, stopping performance was not affected by task-switching. The estimated stop-signal latencies were similar for switch and repetition trials, while the stop-signal delays were longer for switch compared to repetition trials. This result suggests that response inhibition and the inhibition processes in cued task-switching are not relying upon a common mechanism.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Response inhibition
  • Stop signal paradigm
  • Task switching

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in


Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free