The interactive effects of conscientiousness and agreeableness on job performance.

  • Witt L
  • Burke L
  • Barrick M
 et al. 
  • 243

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 193

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

The authors hypothesized that the relationship between conscientiousness and job performance would be stronger for persons high in agreeableness than for those low in agreeableness. Results of hierarchical moderated regression analyses for 7 independent samples of employees across diverse occupations provided support for the hypothesis in 5 of the samples. In samples supporting the hypothesis, among the highly conscientious workers, those low in agreeableness were found to receive lower ratings of job performance than workers high in agreeableness. One explanation for lack of an interaction between conscientiousness and agreeableness in the other 2 samples is that those jobs were not characterized by frequent, cooperative interactions with others. Overall, the results show that highly conscientious workers who lack interpersonal sensitivity may be ineffective, particularly in jobs requiring cooperative interchange with others.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • L. A. Witt

  • Lisa A. Burke

  • Murray R. Barrick

  • Michael K. Mount

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free