Is it meaningful to estimate a probability of extinction?

  • Ludwig D
  • 231


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 226


    Citations of this article.


I calculate probabilities of quasi-extinction of natural populations from time series of census data or estimated abundance. The results depend sensitively upon estimated parameters. Short time series or poor fits of the model to data lead to wide confidence intervals for the probability of quasi-extinction. In many cases there are substantial errors in estimated abundance. These errors further increase the size of the confidence interval, to the point where the estimates may become meaningless. A further complication is that natural populations are subject to occasional catastrophes, and these increase the probability of extinction. Unfortunately, evidence concerning the frequency of occurrence of catastro- phes and the distribution of their sizes is generally lacking. Assessments that fail to compute confidence intervals or that disregard observation errors or possible catastrophes may be unduly optimistic about the viability of natural populations

Author-supplied keywords

  • Natural catastrophes
  • Population viability analysis
  • Probability of extinction
  • Uncertainty

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Donald Ludwig

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free