Low energy values of fish as a probable cause of a major seabird breeding failure in the North Sea

287Citations
Citations of this article
384Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Many seabirds in the North Sea feed on lesser sandeels Ammodytes marinus during the breeding season. Unprecedented breeding failures were recorded at many seabird colonies on the east coast of Britain in 2004. We used demographic, dietary and behavioural data from a long-term study of a colony of common guillemots Uria aalge, the most abundant seabird species in the North Sea, to set the 2004 season in context. Birds at this colony showed greatly reduced breeding success and those chicks that did survive left the colony in very poor condition. The main prey item fed to chicks in 2004 was sprat Sprattus sprattus rather than sandeels, and parents increased the amount of time spent foraging, frequently leaving chicks unattended in order to maintain a normal feeding rate. The calculated daily food intake of chicks derived from these values did not differ markedly from previous years and therefore the magnitude of the impact on chick growth and breeding success appeared disproportionately large. However, nutrient analyses of fish collected from birds in 2004 revealed them to be of significantly lower energy value than expected. Poor food quality therefore appeared to be the proximate cause of seabird breeding failure in 2004 giving support to the 'junk-food' hypothesis. Single-prey loaders such as guillemots will be particularly sensitive to reductions in the energy value of food items. The reasons for the poor fish condition in this part of the North Sea are currently unknown, but the results provide further evidence of major changes in the North Sea food web. © Inter-Research 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wanless, S., Harris, M. P., Redman, P., & Speakman, J. R. (2005). Low energy values of fish as a probable cause of a major seabird breeding failure in the North Sea. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 294, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps294001

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free