This article synthesizes the large but diverse literature on organiza- tional legitimacy, highlighting similarities and disparities among the leading strategic and institutional approaches. The analysis identi- fies three primary forms of legitimacy: pragmatic, based on audience self-interest; moral, based on normative approval: and cognitive, based on comprehensibility and taken-for-grantedness. The article then examines strategies for gaining, maintaining, and repairing le- gitimacy of each type, suggesting both the promises and the pitfalls of such instrumental manipulations.
CITATION STYLE
Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.