Markets, morals, and practices of trade: Jurisdictional disputes in the U.S. commerce in cadavers

  • Michel Anteby
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study examines the U.S. commerce in human cadavers for medical education and research to explore variation in legitimacy in trades involving similar goods. It draws on archival, interview, and observational data mainly from New York State to analyze market participants' efforts to legitimize commerce and resolve a jurisdic-tional dispute. Building on literature on professions, the study shows that how goods are traded, not only what is traded, proves integral to constructing legitimacy, thus suggesting a practice-based view of moral markets. The professionals, including a group of " gatekeepers, " con-struct a narrative distinction between their own commerce and an implicitly less moral alternative and geographi-cally insulate their trades from the broader commerce, creating in effect two circuits. Yet the professionals also promote specifi c practices of trade within their circuit to help them distinguish their own pursuit from an alterna-tive course of action. The study's fi ndings shed light on the micro-foundations of market legitimization and on the role of morals in sustaining professional jurisdictions. •

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Michel Anteby. (2010). Markets, morals, and practices of trade: Jurisdictional disputes in the U.S. commerce in cadavers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), 606–638. Retrieved from http://asq.sagepub.com/content/55/4/606.short

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free