Who matters to universities? A stakeholder perspective on humanities, arts and social sciences valorisation

  • Benneworth P
  • Jongbloed B
  • 201


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 85


    Citations of this article.


Valorisation is at the centre of many debates on the future of academic research. But valorisation has largely become narrowly understood in terms of universities’ economic contributions through patenting, licensing, spin-off formation and technology transfer. This emergent restrictive definition of universities’ societal impacts is a worrying development, overlooking the potential of universities’ knowledge in the Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (HASS). Our hypothesis is that HASS disciplines’ disadvantage compared to the hard sciences (lesser policy attention and funding for commercialisation) arises because HASS stakeholders are not sufficiently salient as stakeholders to universi- ties. Using case studies of three policy experiments, we argue that universities’ respon- siveness to stakeholders does not evolve simply and functionally but in response to the networks of relationships in which they are situated. This has important implications for how stakeholder research is used in higher education research, and for the design and implementation of policies to improve universities’ societal contributions.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Knowledge exchange
  • Knowledge transfer
  • Knowledge transfer policy
  • Social compact
  • Stakeholder theory
  • Universities
  • Universities' societal contribution

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


  • Paul Benneworth

  • Ben W. Jongbloed

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free