Previous assessments of individuals' values for various contraceptive consequences have employed one of four methodologies: free elicitation, direct ratings, multiple regression, or factor analysis. All four methodologies are flawed because they produce group rather than individual values, rely on rating scales, and fail to incorporate information regarding consequence trade-offs. Axiomatic conjoint measurement is proposed as an alternative methodology and used to determine individuals' values for a selected set of contraceptive consequences at two stages of the family-planning career. © 1991 Plenum Publishing Corporation.
CITATION STYLE
Nickerson, C. A. E., McClelland, G. H., & Petersen, D. M. (1991). Measuring contraceptive values: An alternative approach. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 14(3), 241–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00845454
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.