Measuring moral distress in pharmacy and clinical practice

100Citations
Citations of this article
99Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article presents the development, validation and application of an instrument to measure everyday moral distress in different health care settings. The concept of moral distress has been discussed and developed over 20 years. A few instruments have been developed to measure it, predominantly in nursing. The instrument presented here consists of two factors: level of moral distress, and tolerance/openness towards moral dilemmas. It was tested in four medical departments and three pharmacies, where 259 staff members completed a questionnaire. The two factors were found to be reliable. Differences in levels of moral distress were found between pharmacies and clinical departments, and between the youngest and oldest age groups; departmental staff and the youngest group experienced higher levels of moral distress. Departments reported less tolerance/openness towards moral dilemmas than pharmacies. The instrument needs to be tested further, but its strengths are the focus on everyday ethical dilemmas and its usefulness in different health care settings. © 2006 Edward Arnold (Publishers) Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sporrong, S. K., Höglund, A. T., & Arnetz, B. (2006). Measuring moral distress in pharmacy and clinical practice. Nursing Ethics, 13(4), 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1191/0969733006ne880oa

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free