Is the merger necessary? the interactive effect of perceived necessity and sense of continuity on post-merger identification

45Citations
Citations of this article
102Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The changes experienced during a merger often reduce post-merger organizational identification among the workforce, thereby undermining the strategic goals of the merger. While previous research has shown that employees' post-merger identification suffers less when they experience a sense of continuity, the current article explores methods of preserving post-merger identification even when employees experience a sense of discontinuity. It is hypothesized that for these employees, the perceived necessity of the merger strongly influences post-merger identification, because a sense of necessity can reduce the uncertainty that typically inhibits post-merger identification. A field study is presented (N = 144) to support this hypothesis. Finally, implications for the organizational pre-merger communication process are discussed. © The Author(s) 2011.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Giessner, S. R. (2011). Is the merger necessary? the interactive effect of perceived necessity and sense of continuity on post-merger identification. Human Relations, 64(8), 1079–1098. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726711406979

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free