Mild and moderate dyskaryosis: Can women be selected for colposcopy on the basis of social criteria?

29Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective - To describe the distribution of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades among women with mild and moderate dyskaryosis after a single cervical smear and to determine whether social criteria could help identify women who are at increased risk of grade II or III disease. Design - Cross sectional analysis within a randomised prospective study. Subjects had a repeat smear, a colposcopic examination, and an excision biopsy of the transformation zone. In addition, women were asked to complete a social questionnaire. Setting - Colposcopy clinic, Aberdeen. Subjects - 228 women with a single smear test showing mild or moderate dyskaryosis. Main outcome and measures - Histology, age, sexual and contraceptive history, cigarette smoking. Results - 159 (70%) women had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades II or III. Among current smokers the prevalence of grade II and III disease was higher in women who smoked ≥20 cigarettes a day (84%) than among those who smoked less (66%; p < 0.04). Women with more than one sexual partner also had a higher prevalence (75%) than women with only one partner (50%; p = 0.0028). Use of oral contraceptives and younger age were not significantly associated. The prevalence of grade II or III disease was up to 66% in the lower risk groups. Conclusions - Because of the high prevalence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades II and III in both the high and the low risk groups associated factors are not useful for selecting women with mild or moderate dyskaryosis for either early referral to colposcopy or cytological surveillance.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Anderson, D. J., Flannelly, G. M., Kitchener, H. C., Fisher, P. M., Mann, E. M., Campbell, M. K., & Templeton, A. (1992). Mild and moderate dyskaryosis: Can women be selected for colposcopy on the basis of social criteria? British Medical Journal, 305(6845), 84–87. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.305.6845.84

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free