Minimal or massive? the political agenda-setting power of the mass media according to different methods

  • Van Aelst P
  • Walgrave S
  • 100

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 44

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

The debate on the media’s agenda-setting power is not settled yet. Most empirical agenda-setting studies using time-series analyses found that the media matter for the political agenda, but the size of the found media effects remains often modest. This nuanced view on media impact seems to contradict with the perceptions of politicians. Our comparative survey of members of parliament in four small parliamentary democracies—Belgium, Netherlands, Sweden, and Denmark—shows that they consider the mass media to be one of the key political agenda setters directly competing with the Prime Minister and the powerful political parties. This article further explores the inconsistency between “objective” and “subjective” findings. We develop six possible explanations for the contradicting findings produced by both methods and formulate concrete suggestions to improve both methods and diminish the gap between them.

Author-supplied keywords

  • MP survey
  • Political Agenda-setting
  • Time-series

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Peter Van Aelst

  • Stefaan Walgrave

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free