Multiple Regression and Correlation Techniques: Recent Controversies and Best Practices

74Citations
Citations of this article
161Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: This article presumes familiarity with the basics of multiple regression and correlation (MRC) methods and addresses recent controversies and emerging innovations. Areas of emphasis include linking analyses to theory-driven hypotheses, treatment of covariates in hierarchical regression models, recent debates about the testing of mediator and moderator hypotheses, and incorporating confidence intervals into reports of findings using MRC. Conclusions: Two important conceptual innovations (linking analyses closely to theory-derived hypotheses; focusing interpretations on effect sizes and confidence intervals rather than p values) can increase the scientific yield for researchers making use of MRC methods in rehabilitation psychology. © 2008 American Psychological Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hoyt, W. T., Imel, Z. E., & Chan, F. (2008). Multiple Regression and Correlation Techniques: Recent Controversies and Best Practices. Rehabilitation Psychology, 53(3), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013021

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free