Scientometrics, vol. 89, issue 3 (2011) pp. 929-941
Development of bibliometric techniques has reached such a level as to suggest their integration or total substitution for classic peer review in the national research assessment exercises, as far as the hard sciences are concerned. In this work we compare rankings lists of universities captured by the first Italian evaluation exercise, through peer review, with the results of bibliometric simulations. The comparison shows the great differences between peer review and bibliometric rankings for excellence and productivity. © 2011 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary.
Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research
Choose a citation style from the tabs below