Generic

National research assessment exercises: A comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings

Abramo G, D'Angelo C, Costa F ...see all

Scientometrics, vol. 89, issue 3 (2011) pp. 929-941

  • 61

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 27

    Citations

    Citations of this article.
Sign in to save reference

Abstract

Development of bibliometric techniques has reached such a level as to suggest their integration or total substitution for classic peer review in the national research assessment exercises, as far as the hard sciences are concerned. In this work we compare rankings lists of universities captured by the first Italian evaluation exercise, through peer review, with the results of bibliometric simulations. The comparison shows the great differences between peer review and bibliometric rankings for excellence and productivity. © 2011 Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Bibliometrics
  • Italy
  • Peer review
  • Research assessment
  • Research productivity
  • University

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Get full text

Authors

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free