Negative Binomial GAM and GAMM to Analyse Amphibian Roadkills

  • Zuur A
  • Mira A
  • Carvalho F
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
278Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This chapter analyses amphibian fatalities along a road in Portugal. The data are counts of kills making a Gaussian distribution unlikely; restricting our choice of techniques. We began with generalised linear models (GLM) and generalised additive models (GAM) with a Poisson distribution, but these models were overdis- persed. To solve this, you can either apply a quasi-Poisson GLM or GAM, or use the negative binomial distribution (Chapter 9). In this particular example, either approaches can be applied as the overdispersion was fairly small (around 5), but with many ecological data sets it can be considerably larger, in which case the negative binomial GLM (or GAM) is the natural choice. As many textbooks give examples using quasi-Poisson GAMs and GLMs and only a few using the negative binomial, we decided to use the negative binomial distribution. We chose GAM because the relationships between roadkills and explanatory variables were non-linear. We address issues like collinearity, residual patterns, and spatial correlations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zuur, A. F., Mira, A., Carvalho, F., Ieno, E. N., Saveliev, A. A., Smith, G. M., & Walker, N. J. (2009). Negative Binomial GAM and GAMM to Analyse Amphibian Roadkills (pp. 383–397). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87458-6_16

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free