Nonlinear relationships and phylogenetically independent contrasts

  • Quader S
  • Isvaran K
  • Hale R
 et al. 
  • 200


    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 34


    Citations of this article.


The method of phylogenetically independent contrasts is commonly used for exploring cross-taxon relationships between traits. Here we show that this phylogenetic comparative method (PCM) can fail to detect correlated evolution when the underlying relationship between traits is nonlinear. Simulations indicate that statistical power can be dramatically reduced when independent contrasts analysis is used on nonlinear relationships. We also reanalyse a published data set and demonstrate that ignoring nonlinearity can affect biological inferences. We suggest that researchers consider the shape of the relationship between traits when using independent contrasts analysis. Alternative PCMs may be more appropriate if data cannot be transformed to meet assumptions of linearity.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Allometry
  • Computer simulations
  • Phylogenetic comparative method
  • Statistical power
  • Transformations

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document


Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free