We discuss Russell's 1913 essay arguing for the irrelevance of the idea of causation to science and its elimination from metaphysics as a precursor to contemporary philosophical naturalism. We show how Russell's application raises issues now receiving much attention in debates about the adequacy of such naturalism, in particular, problems related to the relationship between folk and scientific conceptual influences on metaphysics, and to the unification of a scientifically inspired worldview. In showing how to recover an approximation to Russell's conclusion while explaining scientists' continuing appeal to causal ideas (without violating naturalism by philosophically correcting scientists) we illustrate a general naturalist strategy for handling problems around the unification of sciences that assume different levels of naïveté with respect to folk conceptual frameworks. We do this despite rejecting one of the premises of Russell's argument, a version of reductionism that was scientifically plausible in 1913 but is not so now. © The Author (2007). Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for the Philosophy of Science. All rights reserved.
CITATION STYLE
Ross, D., & Spurrett, D. (2007). Notions of cause: Russell’s thesis revisited. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axl027
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.