Organizational commitment and the well-being of temporary agency workers: A longitudinal study

66Citations
Citations of this article
145Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Previous research found that organizational commitment is positively related to employee well-being. However, in the current age of contingent work, transitions, and 'protean careers', the advisability of commitment is questionable. Therefore, we analyzed the role of organizational commitment in one paradigmatic area of contingent work arrangements: temporary agency work. In contrast to standard workers, temporary agency workers have to deal with two organizations: the temporary agency and client organization. Results revealed an ambivalent role of organizational commitment for temporary workers. Cross-sectional commitment towards the client organization had positive effects on workers' well-being, whereas commitment towards the agency had no effects. However, longitudinal analyses revealed that commitment to the client was detrimental to workers' well-being when they experienced reassignment to another client. In sum, we found beneficial and dysfunctional effects of organizational commitment on well-being, which suggest the reconsideration of the role of organizational commitment for individuals in unstable work arrangements. Copyright © 2009 The Tavistock Institute.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Moser, K., & Galais, N. (2009). Organizational commitment and the well-being of temporary agency workers: A longitudinal study. Human Relations, 62(4), 589–620. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708101991

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free