Peripheral nerve blocks in paediatric anaesthesia

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction Most children undergoing surgery can benefit from regional anaesthetic techniques, either as the sole anaesthetic regimen or, as usual in paediatric practice, in combination with general anaesthesia. The use of peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) in paediatric anaesthesia is an effective way to decrease the side-effects and complications associated with central blocks. In spite of their many advantages, including easy performance end efficacy, peripheral nerve blocks are still underused. Objective This article discusses a general approach to PNBs in children and provides data concerning the practice of this regional technique in different age groups. Methods Data from 1,650 procedures were prospectively collected during the period from March 1, 2007 to February 29, 2008. The type of PNB, if any, as well as the patient age were noted. Our patients were divided into four groups: 0-3 years, 4-7 years, 8-12 years and 13-18 years. Results During the investigated period, PNBs as a sole technique or in anaesthetized children were performed in 7.45% of cases. Ilioingunal/iliohypogastric nerve block and penile block were the most common (70% of all PNBs) distributed mainly among the children between 4-7 years of age (p<0.05). In older children, extremity PNBs predominate in regard to other types of blocks. PNBs are most frequently performed under general anaesthesia (85%), so the perineural approach requires a safe technique to avoid nerve damage. Conclusion The observed differences in PNB usage seem to be related to patient age and correlate with common pathology and also with technical availability of PNB performance.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Novaković, D., Budić, I., Simić, D., Djordjević, N., Slavkovič, A., & Živanović, D. (2009). Peripheral nerve blocks in paediatric anaesthesia. Srpski Arhiv Za Celokupno Lekarstvo, 137(9–10), 497–501. https://doi.org/10.2298/SARH0910497N

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free