Phylogenetic relationships among bumble bees (Bombus Latr.): a reappraisal of morphological evidence

70Citations
Citations of this article
56Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Abstract. Cladistic analyses of morphological characters of adult bumble bees show significantly higher congruence among characters of the male genitalia than among other characters of males and females. Phylogenetic interpretations of groups supported by the combined morphological evidence (even with minimal assumptions) include (1) that the earliest diverging species belong to the para‐phyletic subgenus Mendacibombus, together with Bombus nevadensis and B.confusus; (2) that, in contrast, species of the subgenus Bombus (sensu stricto) share a relatively recent common ancestor with B.pressus and B.rufipes; and (3) that Psithyrus (the social parasites) is a monophyletic group, and the sister‐group of B.persicus. For genus‐group nomenclature a single genus Bombus (sensu lato) is recommended, to include Psithyrus as another subgenus. Names for sections and for groups of subgenera are synonymized with subgeneric names. Copyright © 1994, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

WILLIAMS, P. H. (1994). Phylogenetic relationships among bumble bees (Bombus Latr.): a reappraisal of morphological evidence. Systematic Entomology, 19(4), 327–344. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3113.1994.tb00594.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free