The price is (almost) right

73Citations
Citations of this article
158Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Most previous research tests market efficiency using average abnormal trading profits on dynamic trading strategies, and typically rejects the joint hypothesis of market efficiency and an asset pricing model. In contrast, we adopt the perspective of a buy-and-hold investor and examine stock price levels. For such an investor, the price level is more relevant than the short-horizon expected return, and betas of cash flow fundamentals are more important than high-frequency stock return betas. Our cross-sectional tests suggest that there exist specifications in which differences in relative price levels of individual stocks can be largely explained by their fundamental betas. © 2009 the American Finance Association.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cohen, R. B., Polk, C., & Vuolteenaho, T. (2009). The price is (almost) right. Journal of Finance, 64(6), 2739–2782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01516.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free