Probability Judgment in Medicine: Discounting Unspecified Possibilities

128Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Research in cognitive psychology has indicated that alternative descriptions of the same event can give rise to different probability judgments. This observation has led to the de velopment of a descriptive account, called support theory, which assumes that the judged probability of an explicit description of an event (that lists specific possibilities) generally exceeds the judged probability of an implicit description of the same event (that does not mention specific possibilities). To investigate this assumption in medical judgment, the au thors presented physicians with brief clinical scenarios describing individual patients and elicited diagnostic and prognostic probability judgments. The results showed that the phy sicians tended to discount unspecified possibilities, as predicted by support theory. The authors suggest that an awareness of the discrepancy between intuitive judgments and the laws of chance may provide opportunities for improving medical decision making. Key words: probability judgment; support theory; unpacking principle; cognition. (Med Decis Making 1995;15:227-230). © 1995, Sage Publications. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Redelmeier, D. A., Koehler, D. J., & Liberman, V. (1995). Probability Judgment in Medicine: Discounting Unspecified Possibilities. Medical Decision Making, 15(3), 227–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X9501500305

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free