Qualitative research, reflexivity and living with risk: Valuing and practicing epistemic reflexivity and centering marginality

30Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In qualitative research, marginality and reflexivity are often closely interwoven. An emic research strategy has provided major stimuli to qualitative psychological investigations. In light of questions posed about conceptualizing marginality, discussion has progressed. A range of ways of practicing epistemic reflexivity now help guard against the idea of any one researcher stance, method or form of inquiry guaranteeing knowledge via unmediated perception. The article espouses the proliferation within qualitative psychology of a range of potentially useful practices. Engaging reflexively with the question of when to centre marginality can be a strategy for attending to emotive forms of data and taking analysis in unexpected directions. Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Henwood, K. (2008). Qualitative research, reflexivity and living with risk: Valuing and practicing epistemic reflexivity and centering marginality. In Qualitative Research in Psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 45–55). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780880701863575

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free