Quality measures for neurologists: Financial and practice implications

10Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Measuring and reporting health care quality is increasingly becoming part of clinical practice and reimbursement for specialists, including neurologists. The goal is to improve the value of care. Current major programs tie quality measurements to reimbursement, including programs from the Centers forMedicare and Medicaid Services: the Physician Quality Reporting System, the Electronic Health Record Incentive Program (and MeaningfulUse), and Accountable CareOrganizations. Many specialty boards, including the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, now require clinical practice quality measurements for maintenance of certification. Practitioners may find these programs confusing, overlapping, burdensome, and not clearly relevant to promoting better patient care. Yet, integrating quality metrics into practice has entered the mainstream and is increasingly tied to reimbursement. Further, over the next few years, most programs will switch from bonus incentives for participation to penalties for nonparticipation. This article aims to clarify current and rising quality measurement programs relevant to neurologists. Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Neurology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cohen, A. B., Sanders, A. E., Swain-Eng, R. J., Gjorvad, G., Tonn, S. T., Bever, C. T., & Cheng, E. M. (2013). Quality measures for neurologists: Financial and practice implications. Neurology: Clinical Practice, 3(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0b013e318283ff1c

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free