Mappings that preserve neighbourhood relationships are important in many contexts, from neurobiology to multivariate data analysis. It is important to be clear about precisely what is meant by preservhg neighbourhoods. At least three issues have to be addressed: how neighbourhoods are defined, how a perfectly neighbourhood preserving mapping is de- fined, and how an objective function for measuring disavpancies from perfect neighbour- hood preservation is defined. We review several standard methods, and using a simple example mapping problem show that the different assumptions of each lead to non-trivially different answers. We also introduce a particular measure for topographic distortion, which has the form of a quadratic assignment problem. Many previous methods are closely related to this measure, which thus serves to unify disparate approaches.
CITATION STYLE
Goodhill, G. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1996). Quantifying neighbourhood preservation in topographic mappings. Proceedings of the 3rd Joint Symposium on Neural Computation, La Jolla, CA, 61–82. Retrieved from https://papers.cnl.salk.edu/PDFs/Quantifying Neighbourhood Preservation in Topographic Mappings 1996-3374.pdf
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.