Relating clinical and neurophysiological assessment of spasticity by machine learning

11Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Spasticity following spinal cord injury (SCI) is most often assessed clinically using a five-point Ashworth score (AS). A more objective assessment of altered motor control may be achieved by using a comprehensive protocol based on a surface electromyographic (sEMG) activity recorded from thigh and leg muscles. However, the relationship between the clinical and neurophysiological assessments is still unknown. In this paper we employ three different classification methods to investigate this relationship. The experimental results indicate that, if the appropriate set of sEMG features is used, the neurophysiological assessment is related to clinical findings and can be used to predict the AS. A comprehensive sEMG assessment may be proven useful as an objective method of evaluating the effectiveness of various interventions and for follow-up of SCI patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zupan, B., Stokić, D. S., Bohanec, M., Priebe, M. M., & Sherwood, A. M. (1998). Relating clinical and neurophysiological assessment of spasticity by machine learning. In International Journal of Medical Informatics (Vol. 49, pp. 243–251). Elsevier Sci Ireland Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1386-5056(98)00043-4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free