Reply to Comment on “Can a light beam be considered to be the sum of a completely polarized and a completely unpolarized beam?”

  • Wolf E
  • 24

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 1

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

In a classic paper that may be regarded as the starting point of polarization optics, G. G. Stokes [Trans. Cambridge Philos. Soc.9, 399 (1852)] presented a theorem according to which any light beam is equivalent to the sum of two light beams, one of which is completely polarized and the other completely unpolarized. We show that Stokes' proof of this theorem is flawed. We present a condition for the theorem to be valid.

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Emil Wolf

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free