Reply to "comment on 'Solving the riddle of the bright mismatches: Labeling and effective binding in oligonucleotide arrays'"

8Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In their Comment, Carlon correctly observe that hybridization experiments in solution have shown an asymmetry which we failed to notice. However, contrary to their statement, the stacking free energies of unlabeled nucleic acids in solution are not compatible with our (and other authors') measurements, even qualitatively. Furthermore, to bolster our paper's assertion that labeling of the nucleic acids materially modifies the observed affinities, we present experimental data in which a change of labeling protocol results in a clear change in the affinities in question. We must therefore agree with extant studies suggesting that the energies of hybridization in solution are a superficial approximation to the much more complex physicochemical process of hybridization of labeled nucleic acids in high-density oligonucleotide arrays. © 2006 The American Physical Society.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Naef, F., Wijnen, H., & Magnasco, M. (2006). Reply to “comment on ‘Solving the riddle of the bright mismatches: Labeling and effective binding in oligonucleotide arrays.’” Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 73(6). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.73.063902

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free