Representing supraspecific taxa in higher-level phylogenetic analyses: Guidelines for palaeontologists

  • Brusatte S
  • 40

    Readers

    Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
  • 19

    Citations

    Citations of this article.

Abstract

Abstract: As phylogenetic analyses become larger, one of the greatest methodological difficulties is representing speciose supraspecific clades in higher-level analyses (e.g. trilobites within studies of arthropod phylogeny). Several strategies have been proposed, including using representative single composite terminals or species-level exemplars, and various methods are currently used in the palaeontological literature. However, this is problematic, as simulation studies and empirical arguments in the systematics literature have clearly identified multiple exemplars as the optimal method. The continuing usage of suboptimal strategies in palaeontology may lessen the accuracy of phylogenies and hampers comparison between alternative studies. Here, I outline problems with suboptimal strategies, review arguments in support of multiple exemplars and provide guidelines for palaeontologists undertaking higher-level phylogenetic analyses.

Author-supplied keywords

  • Archosauria
  • Cladistics
  • Evolution
  • Exemplars
  • Missing data
  • Phylogeny
  • Supraspecific taxa

Get free article suggestions today

Mendeley saves you time finding and organizing research

Sign up here
Already have an account ?Sign in

Find this document

Authors

  • Stephen L. Brusatte

Cite this document

Choose a citation style from the tabs below

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free