Abstract
In this paper, we address the problem of revising a Dung-style abstract argumentation system, when we add a new argument which interacts with one previous argument. We study the impact of such an addition on the outcome of the argumentation system, more particularly on the set of its extensions. Different kinds of revision are defined according to the change induced on the number or on the contents of the extensions. Two particular revisions are studied, for which we propose characterization theorems. Copyright © 2008, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Cayrol, C., De St-Cyr, F. D., & Lagasquie-Schiex, M. C. (2008). Revision of an argumentation system. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (pp. 124–134). Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.
